Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds



If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.

While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.

However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
safe distance from 5g tower  for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).


The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the effect of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.